Comparison between split remote water meter and integrated remote water meter

The main comparison between split remote water meter and integrated remote water meter：

1. Structural Design

Split-type: The base meter (mechanical or electronic) and communication module are designed separately, connected via wires or wirelessly, offering flexible installation and adaptability to complex environments.

Integrated-type: The base meter and communication module are integrated into a single device, resulting in a compact structure and minimal footprint, making them suitable for installation in space-constrained environments.

2. Installation and Maintenance

Split-type: Installation is complex, requiring wiring or wireless pairing between the communication module and base meter. However, maintenance is simplified. If the communication module or base meter malfunctions, the module can be replaced independently, reducing maintenance costs.

Integrated-type: Installation is simple, requiring no additional wiring or communication module installation. However, maintenance costs are higher, as the communication module is integrated with the base meter, and damage to any component may require complete replacement.

3. Environmental Adaptability

Split-type: The communication module is separated from the base meter, protecting it from damage in humid or harsh environments, extending the overall device lifespan. This makes it particularly suitable for complex installation scenarios such as underground wells and narrow pipelines. Integrated: The communication module and base meter are exposed to the same environment, making them susceptible to damage in humid or high-temperature environments and having relatively poor environmental adaptability.

4. Scalability

Split: The base meter and communication module can be flexibly combined to adapt to different communication technologies (such as LoRa, NB-IoT) or management requirements, offering excellent scalability.

Integrated: The communication module and base meter are fixed in design, making it difficult to adapt to different communication technologies or base meter types, resulting in poor scalability.

5. Equipment Cost

Split: The separate design of the communication module and base meter increases the overall equipment cost.

Integrated: The overall equipment cost is relatively low, offering economic advantages, especially in large-scale deployments.

In summary, split-type remote water meters are suitable for complex environments or those with high maintenance requirements, while integrated remote water meters are more suitable for more environmentally friendly and budget-sensitive environments. When choosing a remote water meter, consider factors such as the actual installation environment, maintenance requirements, and budget.